Why the First-Time Buyer Tax Credit shouldn’t matter anymore
shanNdjones September 4th, 2010
Realtors all over the country scrambled in the early months of 2010 to find homes for buyers and sign purchase agreements by April 30, 2010, the deadline for the $8,000 first-time buyer tax credit.
Once the deadline for the first-time home buyer tax credit passed, real estate activity dropped, as evidenced by July’s statistics for pending real estate sales. Many regions, including southern Oregon, have seen a corresponding drop in prices: sellers whose homes didn’t sell in the wave of first-time buyer purchases have found it necessary to lower prices in order to entice buyers to look at and write offers on their homes.
Thinking about this logically, there is a far better long-term advantage to waiting and purchasing a home at the lower prices we are seeing in the market now than paying a slightly inflated price and receiving a one-time $8,000 tax credit. Combine the lower prices with the historically low interest rates currently being offered by banks and mortgage companies, and those lower monthly payments could add up to far more than $8,000 over the life of a 30-year loan.
In an attempt to qualify for the $8,000 tax credit, many first-time buyers may have purchased a home as a hasty, emotional decision. Without the pressure of a deadline, first-time buyers, working with qualified Realtors who have their clients’ best interests in mind, can now make rational, informed home purchasing decisions, and realize the long-term advantages of buying a home at a lower price.
Now there’s talk about bringing back the tax credit. But as this article indicates, the tax credit in the most recent buying frenzy went to people who would have likely purchased homes anyway. Thinking long-term, not re-instating the tax credit makes sense not only for first-time buyers, but also for the overall stability of the national real estate market, and the United States economy as a whole.



